Company's Strategic Slide Presentation Reveals Approach to Detect and Track User Devices for Personalized Advertising
New Article:
Smart Home Devices and Ad Targeting: The Legal Gray Area
Let's delve into the bizarre world of targeted advertising using audio data from smart home devices, as allegedly practiced by Cox Media Group's "Active Listening" tool. A recent leak has shed light on this controversy, and boy, does it get creepy.
The "Active Listening" tool, as the name suggests, reportedly works by capturing your everyday conversations through smart devices and pairs this voice data with your online behavior to target in-market consumers. This includes, but is not limited to, conversations within your living room. To top it off, the system is fueled by artificial intelligence (AI) to collect and analyze behavioral and voice data from over 470 sources.
But, here's the burning question - how does this possibly comply with the law?
Many states, including California, have wiretapping laws that restrict recording conversations without explicit knowledge. If smart devices are recording our conversations around the clock and funneling this data into targeted advertising, isn't that a breach of privacy?
The use of smart home devices for collecting and exploiting personal audio data for ad targeting raises legal concerns about privacy violations. Specifically, it questions compliance with California's state law which requires two-party consent for conversations to be recorded.
Interestingly, the pitch deck also mentions collaboration with major tech players like Google, Amazon, and Facebook. However, it's unclear whether these companies have backed Cox Media Group for the "Active Listening" advertising tool.
Google and Amazon have released statements, dropping Cox Media Group from their advertising partners program, citing violations of their respective policies. Facebook, on the other hand, clarified that it was listed as a general marketing partner, not a partner for the particular advertising program.
In a legal Grey Area, it's important to embrace transparency and user consent. Any utilization of smart home devices for data collection or targeted advertising should inform users about these practices and seek their agreement. Furthermore, compliance with both federal wiretapping laws and relevant state privacy laws, such as California's two-party consent requirement, is critical.
For instance, the federal Wiretap Act restricts intercepting wire, oral, or electronic communications without explicit consent. However, exceptions such as the "business extension" exemption or "single-party consent" rule may come into play.
It's crucial to keep in mind that specific details about Cox Media Group's tool are needed to fully assess its legality under wiretapping laws and state privacy regulations. Regardless, any tool using audio recordings from smart devices must ensure it complies with both federal and state legal frameworks, particularly in states with stringent privacy laws like California.
Stay tuned for more updates as Gizmodo continues our investigation into this complex issue. Don't forget to explore the leaked pitch deck for more insights.
In essence, as users, we must be vigilant and well-informed when dealing with smart home devices and their potential use in targeted advertising. Mind your conversations, folks!
- The scandal surrounding Cox Media Group's "Active Listening" tool highlights the questionable use of technology in the future, as it reportedly gathers behavioral data and voice recordings from smart home devices for ad targeting.
- The legality of this practice is unclear, particularly in light of California's wiretapping laws that require two-party consent for conversations to be recorded.
- In response to the controversy, both Google and Amazon have dropped Cox Media Group from their advertising partners program, while Facebook has clarified its partnership status.
- As users, it's crucial to demand transparency and user consent from tech companies when it comes to data collection or targeted advertising, especially in light of potential ramifications for privacy violation under federal wiretapping laws and state privacy regulations.
