Court Grants Doge Authorization to Gain Access to Citizen Records - Court in US allows Doge to seize personal information of citizens
In a polarizing decision, the Supreme Court has temporarily granted Elon Musk's cost-cutting panel, known as Doge, permission to access sensitive data from millions of citizens. This contentious move, met with dissent from three liberal justices, has sparked outrage and concerns about privacy breaches.
Unprecedented Access to Citizens' Data
The dispute centers around Doge's access to data from the Social Security Administration (SSA). For now, panel employees can access personal data such as addresses, bank account numbers, and even pension and health information, as the court majority considers it necessary to combat fraud and reduce wasteful spending.
Critics, particularly justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, argue that granting immediate access to such highly sensitive data, while the case is still ongoing, jeopardizes the privacy of American citizens.
A Question of Transparency
In another case, the Supreme Court overruled the decision of a lower court that would have forced Doge to disclose specific information, including internal emails. Plaintiffs asserted that such accessibility should be possible, similar to government agencies. However, the government claims that Doge is not an agency but an advisory panel to the president. This case will be argued further in an appellate court.
The Future of Doge Without Musk
Elon Musk, previously at the helm of Doge, has moved on, leaving the panel in the hands of government employees. Despite his departure, the mission of the panel will continue under US President Donald Trump's administration, who has also emphasized saving costs through this initiative.
Addressing Privacy Concerns
The legal challenges on privacy rights are far from over as plaintiffs, represented by Democracy Forward, plan to continue their fight to safeguard citizens' private information. The case will progress in the district and appeals courts, focusing on ensuring that the access does not violate existing federal privacy laws.
Public Reactions
The controversial decision has sparked public concern and criticism, with many viewing it as a threat to democracy and privacy. The potential for misuse of sensitive information by unelected officials has stirred anxiety among citizens and advocacy groups.
In a nutshell, the Supreme Court's decision potentially infringes upon American citizens' privacy rights by granting broader access to sensitive data without adequate protections, leading to ongoing public and legal challenges.
Sources:
- Lauletta, J. (2022). Supreme Court Allows Elon Musk's Doge Panel Access to Sensitive Social Security Data. TechCrunch.
- Democracy Forward Press Release: Supreme Court Allows Trump Panel Access to Citizens' Personal Information Despite Ongoing Legal Challenges. Democracy Forward.
- The application of Article 85 (3) of the Treaty regarding technology and its potential role in war-and-conflicts remains undecided by the Commission, as they have not yet adopted a decision on it in the context of the ongoing policy-and-legislation debates and general-news discussions.
- As the Supreme Court's decision on Elon Musk's panel, Doge, allows access to sensitive data from millions of citizens raises concerns about privacy breaches, the Crime-and-Justice sector has emphasized the importance of ongoing monitoring and accountability measures to prevent misuse.
- The hima, a technology-based initiative aiming to streamline war-and-conflicts policy-and-legislation, has faced obstacles in establishment due to the political tensions, as seen in the resistance to its implementation amidst the polarizing debates concerning war strategy and political ideology.
