Financial regulatory body, BIS, examines potential instability in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrencies as they approach a significant scale or "critical mass."

Financial regulatory body, BIS, examines potential instability in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrencies as they approach a significant scale or "critical mass."

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has recently released a paper outlining several current and potential financial stability risks related to cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi). The focus is on vulnerabilities from high transaction costs, security weaknesses, and interconnectedness with traditional financial systems.

Key risks highlighted include:

1. High and inconsistent transaction costs, poor security, and fraud vulnerabilities in crypto platforms undermine market stability. Cases like LiteBit’s sudden shutdown due to regulatory non-compliance and operational failures can disrupt investor confidence and market functioning.
2. Cybersecurity threats are acute in the DeFi and cryptocurrency sectors. Substantial hacking losses—nearly $14 billion from over 1,300 attacks between 2015 and 2024—can precipitate swift collapses of financial assets, damaging the foundational trust required for financial systems.
3. Stablecoins pose significant financial stability risks because their backing and reserve management may be insufficient to meet redemption demands during runs, potentially leading to liquidity crises and contagion to broader financial markets.
4. Regulatory gaps and fragmented oversight increase systemic fragility, as stablecoins and other digital tokens often fall between existing regulatory frameworks, complicating transparency and consumer protection.
5. Tokenized real-world assets and complex digital securities complicate risk assessment because off-chain asset conditions cannot be verified on-chain, increasing potential for mispricing and regulatory challenges.
6. The potential systemic impact escalates if central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) interact with existing crypto and DeFi ecosystems, as cyberattacks or operational failures in these digital infrastructures could have ripple effects on the broader financial system and even geopolitical consequences.

In summary, the BIS highlights fragile security, liquidity risks from stablecoins, regulatory uncertainty, and the integration risks between crypto/DeFi and traditional finance as central financial stability concerns. The paper also raises concerns about the potential cryptoisation of emerging market economies.

The BIS paper suggests further research into the role of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) in governance, their impact on financial stability, and how regulators could engage. It also proposes imposing similar requirements to TradFi on DeFi, including know your customer compliance, disclosures, and adequate training and qualifications for market professionals.

The paper's authors want to "safeguard the interest of market participants in DeFi" and explore how to address the cryptoisation risks for emerging market economies, a topic that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been highlighting for some time. The authors also want to explore policy approaches to crypto, which could take the form of ban, contain, or regulate.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) authorized the issuance of spot bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, making it easier to gain exposure to crypto. Traditional finance (TradFi) asset managers and broker dealers are becoming more involved in the crypto market. Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) could start to be used more widely by TradFi firms and become part of the mainstream. However, the BIS paper suggests that the Basel banking crypto rules currently consider permissionless blockchains as high risk and discourage banks from getting involved in tokenization on such chains.

The potential instability of stablecoins is an area needing further analysis. Beyond crypto, the BIS paper expresses concerns about TradFi using DeFi smart contracts within TradFi. The European Central Bank's Ulrich Bindseil has made a similar observation about bitcoin redistributing wealth. Real world asset tokenization is expanding, broadening the range of assets in DeFi to include more mainstream ones. The authors of the BIS paper consider the crypto market to have "reached critical mass".

[1] Source: BIS (2023) [2] Source: CoinDesk (2023) [3] Source: IMF (2023) [4] Source: Coindesk (2023) [5] Source: Bank of England (2023)

1. The BIS has emphasized the need for deeper analysis in the area of stablecoin instability, highlighting potential risks associated with their insufficient reserve management.
2. In the light of the potential cryptoisation of emerging market economies, the BIS paper proposes exploring policy approaches that could range from banning, containing, to regulating cryptocurrencies.
3. Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) could become more mainstream as traditional finance firms increasingly engage with the crypto market, according to the BIS paper.
4. The Basel banking crypto rules, despite encouraging banks to get involved in tokenization, consider permissionless blockchains as high risk, discouraging such involvement.
5. The BIS paper raises concerns over traditional finance using DeFi smart contracts, citing potential risks and wealth redistribution observed in the case of bitcoin.
6. The BIS paper suggests that regulatory gaps and fragmented oversight increase systemic fragility, particularly in the case of stablecoins and digital tokens that often fall between existing regulatory frameworks.

Read also: